Archive for the 'Market structure' Category

Dec 05 2007

Is Nokia in denial?

Nokia Won’t Play iPhone’s Tune

As we know, oligopolistic markets are characterized by a few large firms which act interdependently based on the actions of one another. Examples of such interdependence may include pricing and output behavior, advertising behavior, sales and promotions, non-price competition, services offered to consumers, and so on. The “game” of oligopoly is played with one very important goal in mind: maintaining market share in the face of competition from rivals.

In a previous post I discussed some of the strategies Apple has used to break into the oligopolistic market for cellular phones, which it recently did by introducing the thus far wildly successful iPhone. A chart in that post showed that as of earlier this year, the dominant firm in the mobile phone market was Nokia, with a market share of 35.1%. Apple was not even a competitor in this market until July of this year, which saw the successful launch of the iPhone, causing some of the incumbent mobile phone makers to pay close attention to the newcomer’s behavior.

Nokia executives, however, appear to be in denial of the potential threat posed by the iPhone to its dominance in the cell phone industry:

Nokia managers would never admit to being influenced by the Apple iPhone, which mobile phone industry insiders regard as clever but technologically unimpressive. “We don’t determine strategy based on the competition,” insists Anssi Vanjoki, Nokia executive vice-president and general manager for multimedia. “The consumer is our compass.”

Continue Reading »

5 responses so far

Nov 17 2007

Does Apple stand a chance?

China Mobile negotiating with Apple to carry iPhone

Try try as he might, Steve Jobs and Apple can barely launch their hottest new product, the iPhone, before the Chinese have copied it and put a knockoff on the market as quickly as you can say “can you hear me now?” But what is Apple doing making a cell phone anyway? Isn’t the mobile phone market pretty much dominated by a few big name companies already? How will apple ever survive in a market with such well established firms as Nokia, Samsung, and Motorola?

The answer is through product differentiation. The iPhone is truly an innovative little gadget. More than an MP3 player, more than a cell phone, the iPhone has features that differentiate it from most products available from the established firms in the mobile phone market. Like any firm, Apple advertises its iPod through commercials and other media in order to inform consumers about what makes its product special. What message does the following advertisement send about the iPhone?

[youtube 0FFkvhoEfX8]

Continue Reading »

35 responses so far

Nov 13 2007

SAS Economists Podcast #10: Perfect competition and comparative advantage in… the World of Warcraft!

by Hansen Gu and Elaine Lung

Economics is not just for people living in the “real” world, you know! No it’s not. For some of us in high school, we actually prefer the fantasy life of the World of Warcraft. And yes, there is a real economy in our world too. And yes, it does exhibit characteristics of pure competition, and YES, workers do specialize their production based on their own comparative advantage!

Jeeze, why do I feel like I’m always having to defend myself here? Anyway, to learn more about the economy of our favorite fantasy world, watch this video!

[youtube Z0lx4Bko70I]

7 responses so far

Nov 12 2007

SAS Economists Podcast #8 - Shanghai’s fake DVD market

by Alice Su and Jessica Ng

Is it true what they say about the DVD market in China? Can you really buy fake DVDs on the streets for ONE DOLLAR? Come on, that’s a bit extreme, isn’t it? In fact, it’s not just under bridges and in dark alleys where you can buy pirated DVDs in Shanghai, but in respectable shops all over the city that on the outside and in look just like a legitimate DVD shop in the states or Europe.

This podcast will explore the economic characteristics of the market for fake DVDs in Shanghai and determine what it would take for the makers of real DVDs to be able to compete with the well established market for fakes.

[youtube fJkpvaU9izk]

9 responses so far

Nov 12 2007

SAS Economists Podcast #6: The oligopolistic nature of the video game console market

by Annie Sung and Kristie Chung

Which do you prefer, the Wii? the XBox 360? the PS3? How about other video game consoles? Can you even think of any other video games consoles? Hmm… let’s see… how about the Sega? Wait, no, haven’t seen any of those in a while… what about the Atari? Oh, shoot, nope! Oh yeah, don’t forget the Caleco Vision (for the record, Mr. Welker’s earliest video game memory was of playing Smurfs on a Caleco Vision).

The fact is, today, the market for video game consoles has shrunk to three dominant firms: Nintendo, Microsoft and Sony. This podcast will investigate the video game console market, examine its characteristics, including the elasticity of demand for the different consoles, and conclude whether it exhibits the features of an oligopoly.

[youtube Z-5hYryOOyg]

2 responses so far

Nov 05 2007

Non-price competition in the market for… WIKIS!! Wetpaint makes a move to gain market share

Wetpaint, the free online wiki service, has stepped up its use of non-price competition in an attempt to increase its market share in the wiki market. In addition to releasing several Mac vs. PC parody videos meant to showcase the user-friendly, customizability of Wetpaint’s wikis vs. its rivals, the company also announced this morning that it would be offering ad-free wikis to educators!

As a user of Wetpaint since early this year, the distracting presence of advertisements bothered me; the decision to provide educators with ad-free wikis is huge, and makes Wetpaint even more attractive as a platform for hosting online learning communities for teachers of all grade levels.

[youtube X1JSVR0AorQ nolink]

You may be thinking, “Huh? There’s a market for wikis?” Well sure there is. Just because something’s free for us consumers does not mean it’s not a profit oriented business. Wetpaint and its rivals compete for consumers in an oligopolistic market in which competition is not based on price (since its products are essentially free), rather on product differentiation based on features and communicated through advertising and public relations.

Continue Reading »

5 responses so far

Oct 22 2007

SAS Economists Podcast #3: Competition in the Baked Goods Market at SAS

By Nicole Wong and Katherine Yang

Podcast number 3 investigates the competitive market among groups selling baked goods here at Shanghai American School. The annual Relay for Life requires teams to raise 5,000 RMB (equal to about $650) in order to enter in the Relay. The most popular method of raising this entry fee is through bakes sales. This means that the month or so before Relay for Life SAS enters its “bake sale season” when countless teams try and push their products on teachers and students alike.

This podcast will explore the nature of the market for baked goods at SAS, determine the elasticity of demand for baked goods, and explore the prospects for increasing profits among teams hoping to make an easy kuai in the month leading up to the Relay for Life.

If the image is off, right click on the viewer and click “zoom” and “full screen”

 
icon for podpress  Competition in the Baked Goods Market at SAS: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

4 responses so far

Oct 15 2007

SAS Economists Podcast #1: Demand for Eurest cafeteria food at SAS

By Emily Yeh and David Xu:

Introduction: So today on SAS Economists podcast we come to examine the economic practices of our beloved catering service, Eurest. For the last several years Eurest has held our stomachs and their breaths, as they poured out food for the school community’s enjoyment. But how much does the community really enjoy the services provided by Eurest? Too often complaints about the variety of food or taste and appeal are expressed by students and teachers when the name “Eurest” is mentioned.

Today, we will examine the alleged gap between price and quality for Eurest’s food. We’ll try to find out whether the prices charged for cafeteria food truly reflect the costs to Eurest, or whether it is monopoly power that result in the prices many students consider to be unreasonable. Does a lack of competition result in x-inefficiency on behalf of Eurest? If students had the benefit of greater variety and the freedom to eat off campus, how would Eurest match up against greater competition? What can the company do to achiever a higher level of customer satisfaction? These questions and more in the first EVER SAS Economists podcast!

To play, click on the viewer below and wait a couple of minutes for the video to load. It will play automatically once it has buffered.

 
icon for podpress  A mealtime monopoly - Demand for SAS's cafeteria food [5:28m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

12 responses so far