Archive for the 'food prices' Category

Sep 24 2009

The magical recession proof bunny

Chocolate Sales: A Sweet Spot in the Recession – TIME
http://kiwifruit-the-blog.co.nz/images/Lindt%20Bunny.jpg
Living in Switzerland, I find an article featuring a local business from the town my school is in irresistible, particularly when it appear in TIME magazine. Lindt chocolate, the company featured in this article, manufactures its delicate treats right down the hill from the ZIS campus, which means that when the wind is just right, you can just catch the scent of fresh, creamy chocolate wafting up the hillside while walking to campus.

Lindt, as well as its global competitors in the chocolate business, is enjoying surge in demand even while countless other industries are forced to cut back production, lay off workers, and close their factory doors. From TIME:

While the credit crisis has slowed down sales of everything from cars to organic groceries, people seem happy to keep shelling out for chocolate. Last year, as the global recession was gaining ground, Swiss chocolate makers bucked the trend with record sales — nearly 185,000 tons, an increase of 2% over 2007, sold domestically and in 140 export markets…

“Switzerland’s image sells well abroad, and nothing says ‘Switzerland’ more than chocolate,” says Stephane Garelli, director of the World Competitiveness Center at the Institute of Management Development (IMD) in Lausanne, predicting that this comfort food will continue to sweeten the sour economy for months to come…

“Now that people don’t have a new television or a new car,” he noted, “they eat a bit more chocolate.”

“Chocolate is one of the more recession-resilient food sectors,” says Dean Best, executive director of Just-Food, a U.K.-based news and information website for the global food industry. “With consumers eating out less and eating at home more, there is evidence that they are still allowing themselves the occasional indulgence — and chocolate is a relatively inexpensive indulgence.”

But the question of why there is no meltdown in the chocolate business may be more a matter of psychology than economics. “There is well-documented evidence going back to Freud, showing that in times of anxiety and uncertainty, when people need a boost, they turn to chocolate,” says Garelli of the IMD. “That’s why when the economy is bad, chocolate is still selling well.”

Which goes to show that chocolate is more than a candy treat — it’s real food for the soul.

So does this mean chocolate is an inferior good, or one for which demand increases as incomes fall? I doubt many Swiss chocolate producers would consider their product inferior, but perhaps it does fit the definition.

On the other hand, perhaps the reason demand for chocolate increases during a recession has more to do with the substitution effect than the income effect. As people eat out less, they consume fewer expensive deserts at restaurants and instead fill their shopping baskets with more affordable dessert options for the home. I can say from experience that this is the case for myself.

Living in Switzerland, I find myself rarely going out to eat at restaurants, an activity reserved for special occasions in this country where a steak can set you back 75 dollars. Instead, I eat at home almost every night, and nothing is more appealing to me, especially during hard economic times, than a bar of delicious chocolate after a home cooked meal. Demand for chocolate may rise during recessions simply because the demand for one of its substitutes (restaurant desserts) falls.

Discussion questions:

  1. Do you think chocolate is an inferior good or a normal good? What’s the difference? What types of goods do YOU consome more of when you find yourself faced with a tighter budget?
  2. Does economics have a good explanation for the above situation? The article mentions Freud, a pioneer in  the field of psychology; do humans’ economic behavior always appear rational?
  3. If chocolate were an inferior good, what would happen to chocolate sales when the global economy finally turns around and incomes start increasing? What do you think will happen to chocolate sales when the economy starts imrpoving? Explain.

12 responses so far

Jun 10 2008

Hunger, poverty and fiscal policy in the United States

U.S. food stamp use up sharply, sign of hard times (Reuters) by Charles Abbott

27.88 million people in the US are going hungry this year. That’s 1.5 million more than last year. As food prices are rising all over the world, more low income families in the US are turning to the government for help.

In the US low incomes families and individuals can apply for food stamps. Food stamps are vouchers that can be used to purchase basic food items, milk, bread, eggs, cheese, chicken etc. These direct subsidies serve two functions, one is to feed more people and the other is to stimulate the domestic economy. With the unemployment rate at 5.5% and with inflation rising, everyone is affected but the poorest of the poor are most affected as they deal with these rising costs and shrinking incomes (less purchasing power).

“The record for food stamp participation is 29.85 million people in November 2005, which included emergency benefits to victims of hurricanes Katrina, Rita and Wilma, said USDA. Second-highest was 27.97 million people in March 1994, said the Food Research and Action Center, an antihunger group.”

In 2005 it was a major catastrophe that caused the jump in demand for food stamps. Today, the problem is much bigger, and broader. Rising fuel costs, rising costs of wheat, and the credit crunch are affecting businesses and businesses are beginning to lay off employees or are passing on their rising costs of production to the consumer, exacerbating rising inflation. So what can be done? Many people are encouraging Congress to take action.

“Now is the time for Congress to pass temporary increases in food stamps, extended unemployment insurance and other targeted relief that will stimulate the economy and help struggling families,” said James Weill, FRAC’s president. He pointed to May’s increase in unemployment, to 5.5 percent.

The Department of Food and Agriculture listed 1994 as the last time that 27 million people were using food stamps.

“Food stamp enrollment has exceeded 27 million people each month this fiscal year. USDA estimates enrollment will average 27.98 million people in fiscal 2009, which begins on October 1, at a cost of $40.3 billion.”

$40.3 billion dollars in government spending on food stamps alone seems like an enormous sum of money, but what is the alternative?

YouTube Preview Image

Discussion Questions:

  1. What will be the affect of using expansionary fiscal policy at a time when inflation is already rising?
  2. How will increasing government spending on food stamps when the government is already running a budget deficit affect interest rates and private investment in the economy?
  3. What effect would expansionary fiscal policy have on aggregate supply if crowding-out of private investment occurs?
  4. How else could the government allocate the $40.3 billion it spends on food stamps to stimulate the economy and bring relief to the hungry poor? Brainstorm other policy options in your comments.

3 responses so far