<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How big is the government spending multiplier in America? Well, it depends on which economist you ask&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/2009/09/29/how-big-is-the-government-spending-multiplier-in-america-well-it-depends-on-which-economist-you-ask/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/2009/09/29/how-big-is-the-government-spending-multiplier-in-america-well-it-depends-on-which-economist-you-ask/</link>
	<description>for students and teachers of Economics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 04:39:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: srmcook</title>
		<link>http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/2009/09/29/how-big-is-the-government-spending-multiplier-in-america-well-it-depends-on-which-economist-you-ask/comment-page-1/#comment-19781</link>
		<dc:creator>srmcook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 08:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/?p=1185#comment-19781</guid>
		<description>3. What are the animal spirits the article mentions? Where have you heard this expression before? 
 
&#8226; &quot;Animal Spirits&quot; in this article (and generally) refers to consumer confidence. We have heard this expression in a prior assignment when studying Keynes&#039; beliefs. 
 
4. Do you think borrowing trillions of dollars and spending it to put people back to work and try to dig the US economy out of recession is wise, or should the US government be practicing better fiscal responsibility? 
 
That depends. Drawing on Keynes&#039; beliefs, expansionary fiscal policy is very often beneficial in stimulating an economy in times of recession; it creates new jobs, puts those unemployed back in jobs/positions, and returns a nation&#039;s AD back to regular levels. However, from what we have seen over the last few years in the United States, we can very evidently see that more sophisticated and more appropriate fiscal  responsibility and policy is necessary and urgently called for. The next elections, coming up in 2012, will hopefully give us the opportunity to correct the flagrant, misguided, liberal, economic policies followed by the current US Presidential Administration.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3. What are the animal spirits the article mentions? Where have you heard this expression before? </p>
<p>&bull; &quot;Animal Spirits&quot; in this article (and generally) refers to consumer confidence. We have heard this expression in a prior assignment when studying Keynes&#039; beliefs. </p>
<p>4. Do you think borrowing trillions of dollars and spending it to put people back to work and try to dig the US economy out of recession is wise, or should the US government be practicing better fiscal responsibility? </p>
<p>That depends. Drawing on Keynes&#039; beliefs, expansionary fiscal policy is very often beneficial in stimulating an economy in times of recession; it creates new jobs, puts those unemployed back in jobs/positions, and returns a nation&#039;s AD back to regular levels. However, from what we have seen over the last few years in the United States, we can very evidently see that more sophisticated and more appropriate fiscal  responsibility and policy is necessary and urgently called for. The next elections, coming up in 2012, will hopefully give us the opportunity to correct the flagrant, misguided, liberal, economic policies followed by the current US Presidential Administration.  </p>
<p>Like or Dislike: <img style="padding: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" onmouseover="this.width=this.width*1.3" onmouseout="this.width=this.width/1.2" id="up-19781" src="http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/images/1_14_up.png" alt="Thumb up" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('19781', 'add', 'welkerswikinomics.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/', '1_14_');" title="Thumb up" /> <span id="karma-19781-up" style="font-size:12px; color:#009933;">0</span>&nbsp;<img style="padding: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" onmouseover="this.width=this.width*1.3" onmouseout="this.width=this.width/1.2" id="down-19781" src="http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/images/1_14_down.png" alt="Thumb down" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('19781', 'subtract', 'welkerswikinomics.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/', '1_14_')" title="Thumb down" /> <span id="karma-19781-down" style="font-size:12px; color:#990033;">0</span></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: srmcook</title>
		<link>http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/2009/09/29/how-big-is-the-government-spending-multiplier-in-america-well-it-depends-on-which-economist-you-ask/comment-page-1/#comment-19780</link>
		<dc:creator>srmcook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 08:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/?p=1185#comment-19780</guid>
		<description>1. Why do tax cuts for the rich tend to have a smaller multiplier effect than tax cuts for lower income households? 
 
&#8226; The rich tend to make up a much smaller proportion of a national economy, and the average-income households make up the majority of an economy. Therefore, MPC will increase only slightly, because avg. income households will save more money than consume. The rich will consume more, but since they make up a usually very small proportion of an economy, as mentioned, the MPC will increase only slightly, compared to the majority of the population. 
 
2. How can government borrowing drive up interest rates, and why is this a concern to policy makers deciding on the size of a fiscal stimulus package? 
 
&#8226; The government is competing against the private sector for money, thus driving up interest rates on the money, because it is limited in amount. The reason this concerns policy-makers is because the higher the interest rates, the more money they will have to pay back when they must re-pay the money they borrowed. 
 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Why do tax cuts for the rich tend to have a smaller multiplier effect than tax cuts for lower income households? </p>
<p>&bull; The rich tend to make up a much smaller proportion of a national economy, and the average-income households make up the majority of an economy. Therefore, MPC will increase only slightly, because avg. income households will save more money than consume. The rich will consume more, but since they make up a usually very small proportion of an economy, as mentioned, the MPC will increase only slightly, compared to the majority of the population. </p>
<p>2. How can government borrowing drive up interest rates, and why is this a concern to policy makers deciding on the size of a fiscal stimulus package? </p>
<p>&bull; The government is competing against the private sector for money, thus driving up interest rates on the money, because it is limited in amount. The reason this concerns policy-makers is because the higher the interest rates, the more money they will have to pay back when they must re-pay the money they borrowed. </p>
<p>Like or Dislike: <img style="padding: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" onmouseover="this.width=this.width*1.3" onmouseout="this.width=this.width/1.2" id="up-19780" src="http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/images/1_14_up.png" alt="Thumb up" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('19780', 'add', 'welkerswikinomics.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/', '1_14_');" title="Thumb up" /> <span id="karma-19780-up" style="font-size:12px; color:#009933;">0</span>&nbsp;<img style="padding: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" onmouseover="this.width=this.width*1.3" onmouseout="this.width=this.width/1.2" id="down-19780" src="http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/images/1_14_down.png" alt="Thumb down" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('19780', 'subtract', 'welkerswikinomics.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/', '1_14_')" title="Thumb down" /> <span id="karma-19780-down" style="font-size:12px; color:#990033;">0</span></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fiscal Policy &#8211; the Government Spending Multiplier &#124; The Economics Classroom</title>
		<link>http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/2009/09/29/how-big-is-the-government-spending-multiplier-in-america-well-it-depends-on-which-economist-you-ask/comment-page-1/#comment-19234</link>
		<dc:creator>Fiscal Policy &#8211; the Government Spending Multiplier &#124; The Economics Classroom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 20:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/?p=1185#comment-19234</guid>
		<description>[...] How big is the government spending multiplier in America? Well, it depends on which economist you as... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] How big is the government spending multiplier in America? Well, it depends on which economist you as&#8230; [...]</p>
<p>Like or Dislike: <img style="padding: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" onmouseover="this.width=this.width*1.3" onmouseout="this.width=this.width/1.2" id="up-19234" src="http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/images/1_14_up.png" alt="Thumb up" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('19234', 'add', 'welkerswikinomics.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/', '1_14_');" title="Thumb up" /> <span id="karma-19234-up" style="font-size:12px; color:#009933;">0</span>&nbsp;<img style="padding: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" onmouseover="this.width=this.width*1.3" onmouseout="this.width=this.width/1.2" id="down-19234" src="http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/images/1_14_down.png" alt="Thumb down" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('19234', 'subtract', 'welkerswikinomics.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/', '1_14_')" title="Thumb down" /> <span id="karma-19234-down" style="font-size:12px; color:#990033;">0</span></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Ely</title>
		<link>http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/2009/09/29/how-big-is-the-government-spending-multiplier-in-america-well-it-depends-on-which-economist-you-ask/comment-page-1/#comment-10089</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Ely</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 19:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/?p=1185#comment-10089</guid>
		<description>1. Why do tax cuts for the rich tend to have a smaller multiplier effect than tax cuts for lower income households? 
Lower income people spend a higher percentage of their income than the wealthy, who tend to save more. 
   2. How can government borrowing drive up interest rates, and why is this a concern to policy makers deciding on the size of a fiscal stimulus package? 
Governments sell bonds to finance deficit spending. This increase in supply of bonds drives down their price, thus increasing the interest earned on each bond. To compete with the higher return offered by government bonds, private banks must raise interest rates.  These higher interest rates decrease the level of investment, a potentially dangerous consequence. 
   3. What are the animal spirits the article mentions? Where have you heard this expression before? 
We heard this term in the Keynes vs. Hayek rap video, where Keynes referenced animal spirits. They are the confidence or lack thereof that consumers and investors have. Higher confidence leads to higher investment and consumption, while the opposite is true for lack of confidence. 
   4. Do you think borrowing trillions of dollars and spending it to put people back to work and try to dig the US economy out of recession is wise, or should the US government be practicing better fiscal responsibility? 
I believe it is a good idea, because it is the most effective way of driving up demand and restoring confidence. However, repeated and long-term borrowing can bankrupt a government, so restraint is needed to a certain degree. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Why do tax cuts for the rich tend to have a smaller multiplier effect than tax cuts for lower income households?</p>
<p>Lower income people spend a higher percentage of their income than the wealthy, who tend to save more.</p>
<p>   2. How can government borrowing drive up interest rates, and why is this a concern to policy makers deciding on the size of a fiscal stimulus package?</p>
<p>Governments sell bonds to finance deficit spending. This increase in supply of bonds drives down their price, thus increasing the interest earned on each bond. To compete with the higher return offered by government bonds, private banks must raise interest rates.  These higher interest rates decrease the level of investment, a potentially dangerous consequence.</p>
<p>   3. What are the animal spirits the article mentions? Where have you heard this expression before?</p>
<p>We heard this term in the Keynes vs. Hayek rap video, where Keynes referenced animal spirits. They are the confidence or lack thereof that consumers and investors have. Higher confidence leads to higher investment and consumption, while the opposite is true for lack of confidence.</p>
<p>   4. Do you think borrowing trillions of dollars and spending it to put people back to work and try to dig the US economy out of recession is wise, or should the US government be practicing better fiscal responsibility?</p>
<p>I believe it is a good idea, because it is the most effective way of driving up demand and restoring confidence. However, repeated and long-term borrowing can bankrupt a government, so restraint is needed to a certain degree. </p>
<p>Like or Dislike: <img style="padding: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" onmouseover="this.width=this.width*1.3" onmouseout="this.width=this.width/1.2" id="up-10089" src="http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/images/1_14_up.png" alt="Thumb up" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('10089', 'add', 'welkerswikinomics.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/', '1_14_');" title="Thumb up" /> <span id="karma-10089-up" style="font-size:12px; color:#009933;">0</span>&nbsp;<img style="padding: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" onmouseover="this.width=this.width*1.3" onmouseout="this.width=this.width/1.2" id="down-10089" src="http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/images/1_14_down.png" alt="Thumb down" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('10089', 'subtract', 'welkerswikinomics.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/', '1_14_')" title="Thumb down" /> <span id="karma-10089-down" style="font-size:12px; color:#990033;">0</span></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew McLennaghan</title>
		<link>http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/2009/09/29/how-big-is-the-government-spending-multiplier-in-america-well-it-depends-on-which-economist-you-ask/comment-page-1/#comment-10074</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew McLennaghan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 03:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/?p=1185#comment-10074</guid>
		<description>In families with lower disposable incomes taxes severely affect their decision making on what they need and want. So when their DI increases they can spend the money on what they want and what their need rather than solely paying for their needs. Where as families with higher DI&#039;s  already have enough money to full fill their wants and needs with out the need to worry about the tax.  
 
When the Government spends too much then interest rates will raise so that G can get some money back. 
 
Animal spirits, is the fact that human&#039;s are not perfect therefore why nothing in economics can be definitely calculated to the specific person. Because nobody is exactly the same. And I heard this is class yesterday. 
 
I think this is good because if I remember this is called a stimulus package The whole goal of the stimulus package is to supply AD with a kick which would then restore company&#039;s revenue. This is done with the idea that it remains like that so company&#039;s start re-employing workers. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In families with lower disposable incomes taxes severely affect their decision making on what they need and want. So when their DI increases they can spend the money on what they want and what their need rather than solely paying for their needs. Where as families with higher DI&#039;s  already have enough money to full fill their wants and needs with out the need to worry about the tax. </p>
<p>When the Government spends too much then interest rates will raise so that G can get some money back.</p>
<p>Animal spirits, is the fact that human&#039;s are not perfect therefore why nothing in economics can be definitely calculated to the specific person. Because nobody is exactly the same. And I heard this is class yesterday.</p>
<p>I think this is good because if I remember this is called a stimulus package The whole goal of the stimulus package is to supply AD with a kick which would then restore company&#039;s revenue. This is done with the idea that it remains like that so company&#039;s start re-employing workers. </p>
<p>Like or Dislike: <img style="padding: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" onmouseover="this.width=this.width*1.3" onmouseout="this.width=this.width/1.2" id="up-10074" src="http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/images/1_14_up.png" alt="Thumb up" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('10074', 'add', 'welkerswikinomics.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/', '1_14_');" title="Thumb up" /> <span id="karma-10074-up" style="font-size:12px; color:#009933;">0</span>&nbsp;<img style="padding: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" onmouseover="this.width=this.width*1.3" onmouseout="this.width=this.width/1.2" id="down-10074" src="http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/images/1_14_down.png" alt="Thumb down" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('10074', 'subtract', 'welkerswikinomics.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/', '1_14_')" title="Thumb down" /> <span id="karma-10074-down" style="font-size:12px; color:#990033;">0</span></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bjorn Kvaale</title>
		<link>http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/2009/09/29/how-big-is-the-government-spending-multiplier-in-america-well-it-depends-on-which-economist-you-ask/comment-page-1/#comment-10073</link>
		<dc:creator>Bjorn Kvaale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 01:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/?p=1185#comment-10073</guid>
		<description>Tax cuts would have a greater effect for low income households because they must spend more of their money on taxes, therefore increasing the multiplier to a greater extent than the richer households. The rich, on the other hand, must pay a greater percentage of taxes, yet they make more money, so they also have some money to save or spend elsewhere. Therefore, they have less of an impact on the multiplier than the poorer households. I think the stimulus package is a good idea overall because it will increase AD in the short run, which will hopefully lead to an increased AD in the long run too. With stability in the short run, maybe the long run can profit from this. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tax cuts would have a greater effect for low income households because they must spend more of their money on taxes, therefore increasing the multiplier to a greater extent than the richer households. The rich, on the other hand, must pay a greater percentage of taxes, yet they make more money, so they also have some money to save or spend elsewhere. Therefore, they have less of an impact on the multiplier than the poorer households. I think the stimulus package is a good idea overall because it will increase AD in the short run, which will hopefully lead to an increased AD in the long run too. With stability in the short run, maybe the long run can profit from this. </p>
<p>Like or Dislike: <img style="padding: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" onmouseover="this.width=this.width*1.3" onmouseout="this.width=this.width/1.2" id="up-10073" src="http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/images/1_14_up.png" alt="Thumb up" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('10073', 'add', 'welkerswikinomics.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/', '1_14_');" title="Thumb up" /> <span id="karma-10073-up" style="font-size:12px; color:#009933;">0</span>&nbsp;<img style="padding: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" onmouseover="this.width=this.width*1.3" onmouseout="this.width=this.width/1.2" id="down-10073" src="http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/images/1_14_down.png" alt="Thumb down" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('10073', 'subtract', 'welkerswikinomics.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/', '1_14_')" title="Thumb down" /> <span id="karma-10073-down" style="font-size:12px; color:#990033;">0</span></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rusty Knaub</title>
		<link>http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/2009/09/29/how-big-is-the-government-spending-multiplier-in-america-well-it-depends-on-which-economist-you-ask/comment-page-1/#comment-10070</link>
		<dc:creator>Rusty Knaub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 23:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/?p=1185#comment-10070</guid>
		<description>1. Tax cuts for low income households will have a greater effect on the multiplier because these households spend most of their DI. This is because they cannot afford to save their money and if they see a cut in taxes they are more likely to consume more due to their higher DI. The richer households on the other hand have (as Bjorn mentioned) the luxury to place some of their income into saving accounts and would therefore not differ much in their consumption habits if they had an increase in their DI.  
 
2. If the government borrows too much then interest rates will be pushed up because the government will have lost a lot of money in it&#039;s borrowing of money and will drive up interest rates in order to gain some money back; this could then lead to a &quot;crowding out&quot; in public investment. And this is a concern to policy makers because the bigger the fiscal stimulus package the higher the interest rates will be and the lower public investment will be leading to no output increase.  
 
3. The animal spirits referred to in this article is in sorts the bare instincts or faith of the people to their government. For example, the Keynesian believe that lower interest rates could revive the faith of the people and drive them to help their government and invest more into new capital. This term was also mentioned in the rap video we watched in class about the Keynesian vs. Classical views on macroeconomics.  
 
4. I think it&#039;s a good idea because government spending has a solid theory which supports that AD should increase and even multiply after a stimulus package is poured into the economy. Also I think it&#039;s a better idea than the classical point of view that the government should not do anything because the economy will fix itself...but that could take a while and I feel obliged to quote Keynes&#039;s motto &quot;In the long-run we&#039;re all dead&quot;. Although the economy could self-correct eventually there are too many unemployed people for the government to just sit on its hands and do nothing. If an increase in G leads to an increase in AD in addition to an increase in I + C depending on the multiplier, and with AD shifting out the economy should gradually move towards an equilibrium PL with the NRU or Yfe then why not do it? In my mind there is no doubt that Obama and his team did the right thing. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Tax cuts for low income households will have a greater effect on the multiplier because these households spend most of their DI. This is because they cannot afford to save their money and if they see a cut in taxes they are more likely to consume more due to their higher DI. The richer households on the other hand have (as Bjorn mentioned) the luxury to place some of their income into saving accounts and would therefore not differ much in their consumption habits if they had an increase in their DI. </p>
<p>2. If the government borrows too much then interest rates will be pushed up because the government will have lost a lot of money in it&#039;s borrowing of money and will drive up interest rates in order to gain some money back; this could then lead to a &quot;crowding out&quot; in public investment. And this is a concern to policy makers because the bigger the fiscal stimulus package the higher the interest rates will be and the lower public investment will be leading to no output increase. </p>
<p>3. The animal spirits referred to in this article is in sorts the bare instincts or faith of the people to their government. For example, the Keynesian believe that lower interest rates could revive the faith of the people and drive them to help their government and invest more into new capital. This term was also mentioned in the rap video we watched in class about the Keynesian vs. Classical views on macroeconomics. </p>
<p>4. I think it&#039;s a good idea because government spending has a solid theory which supports that AD should increase and even multiply after a stimulus package is poured into the economy. Also I think it&#039;s a better idea than the classical point of view that the government should not do anything because the economy will fix itself&#8230;but that could take a while and I feel obliged to quote Keynes&#039;s motto &quot;In the long-run we&#039;re all dead&quot;. Although the economy could self-correct eventually there are too many unemployed people for the government to just sit on its hands and do nothing. If an increase in G leads to an increase in AD in addition to an increase in I + C depending on the multiplier, and with AD shifting out the economy should gradually move towards an equilibrium PL with the NRU or Yfe then why not do it? In my mind there is no doubt that Obama and his team did the right thing. </p>
<p>Like or Dislike: <img style="padding: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" onmouseover="this.width=this.width*1.3" onmouseout="this.width=this.width/1.2" id="up-10070" src="http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/images/1_14_up.png" alt="Thumb up" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('10070', 'add', 'welkerswikinomics.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/', '1_14_');" title="Thumb up" /> <span id="karma-10070-up" style="font-size:12px; color:#009933;">0</span>&nbsp;<img style="padding: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" onmouseover="this.width=this.width*1.3" onmouseout="this.width=this.width/1.2" id="down-10070" src="http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/images/1_14_down.png" alt="Thumb down" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('10070', 'subtract', 'welkerswikinomics.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/', '1_14_')" title="Thumb down" /> <span id="karma-10070-down" style="font-size:12px; color:#990033;">0</span></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: axel</title>
		<link>http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/2009/09/29/how-big-is-the-government-spending-multiplier-in-america-well-it-depends-on-which-economist-you-ask/comment-page-1/#comment-8910</link>
		<dc:creator>axel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 04:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/?p=1185#comment-8910</guid>
		<description>Tax cuts for the rich tend to have a smaller multiplier because the rich do not spend as much of their income. but, for the poor since they spend more of their income it significantly changes the amount that they can buy.  
government borrowing drive up interest rates because if the government needs to borrow money then they usually borrow a lot of money, therefore they increase the amount demanded and the rates go up.  
I think that borrowing trillions of dollars and spending it will put people back to work, since it seems like what an entrepreneur has to do. an entrepreneur borrows money to start a business then makes enough money to pay back the loan. just now the government is doing it and people will be paying back by taxes. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tax cuts for the rich tend to have a smaller multiplier because the rich do not spend as much of their income. but, for the poor since they spend more of their income it significantly changes the amount that they can buy. </p>
<p>government borrowing drive up interest rates because if the government needs to borrow money then they usually borrow a lot of money, therefore they increase the amount demanded and the rates go up. </p>
<p>I think that borrowing trillions of dollars and spending it will put people back to work, since it seems like what an entrepreneur has to do. an entrepreneur borrows money to start a business then makes enough money to pay back the loan. just now the government is doing it and people will be paying back by taxes. </p>
<p>Like or Dislike: <img style="padding: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" onmouseover="this.width=this.width*1.3" onmouseout="this.width=this.width/1.2" id="up-8910" src="http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/images/1_14_up.png" alt="Thumb up" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('8910', 'add', 'welkerswikinomics.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/', '1_14_');" title="Thumb up" /> <span id="karma-8910-up" style="font-size:12px; color:#009933;">0</span>&nbsp;<img style="padding: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" onmouseover="this.width=this.width*1.3" onmouseout="this.width=this.width/1.2" id="down-8910" src="http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/images/1_14_down.png" alt="Thumb down" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('8910', 'subtract', 'welkerswikinomics.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/', '1_14_')" title="Thumb down" /> <span id="karma-8910-down" style="font-size:12px; color:#990033;">0</span></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bjorn Borgers</title>
		<link>http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/2009/09/29/how-big-is-the-government-spending-multiplier-in-america-well-it-depends-on-which-economist-you-ask/comment-page-1/#comment-8889</link>
		<dc:creator>Bjorn Borgers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 16:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/?p=1185#comment-8889</guid>
		<description>In low income families, taxes weigh heavily.  If we reduce taxes, more members of the families are likley to look for work, as they will have more money left over after tax, and will therefore be more willing (and able) to spend.  This higher spending leads to more government revenues from VAT.  Those who have a high income have the luxury to save some of their money, and are thus less likley to have a large effect on the multiplyer... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In low income families, taxes weigh heavily.  If we reduce taxes, more members of the families are likley to look for work, as they will have more money left over after tax, and will therefore be more willing (and able) to spend.  This higher spending leads to more government revenues from VAT.  Those who have a high income have the luxury to save some of their money, and are thus less likley to have a large effect on the multiplyer&#8230; </p>
<p>Like or Dislike: <img style="padding: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" onmouseover="this.width=this.width*1.3" onmouseout="this.width=this.width/1.2" id="up-8889" src="http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/images/1_14_up.png" alt="Thumb up" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('8889', 'add', 'welkerswikinomics.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/', '1_14_');" title="Thumb up" /> <span id="karma-8889-up" style="font-size:12px; color:#009933;">0</span>&nbsp;<img style="padding: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" onmouseover="this.width=this.width*1.3" onmouseout="this.width=this.width/1.2" id="down-8889" src="http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/images/1_14_down.png" alt="Thumb down" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('8889', 'subtract', 'welkerswikinomics.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/', '1_14_')" title="Thumb down" /> <span id="karma-8889-down" style="font-size:12px; color:#990033;">0</span></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

