<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Welker&#8217;s daily links 09/09/2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/2008/09/10/welkers-daily-links-09092008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/2008/09/10/welkers-daily-links-09092008/</link>
	<description>for students and teachers of AP and IB Economics</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 03:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve Latter</title>
		<link>http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/2008/09/10/welkers-daily-links-09092008/comment-page-1/#comment-5724</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Latter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 20:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/2008/09/10/welkers-daily-links-09092008/#comment-5724</guid>
		<description>Hi Laura,

Thanks for the post. In America, the economic growth has been increasing the American wages. You will learn that economic growth is really measured by a statisistic called real GDP which is exactly the same thing as real income (they both add up to the same number).

I think what you are actually referring to is the fact that although America's real income growth ("purchasing power") has been strong this decade (2.5% average annual growth which is nominal income less inflation), the growth has been virtually non-existent for America's middle class and poor. The real income gains have accrued almost exclusively to the educated "white collar" workers, the entrepreneurs, and the business owners (stock holders). Global competition has kept the middle and lower class wages down keeping a large part of the labor force at the same standard of living that they were at in 2000. The middle class is, however, enjoying many of the non-financial, quality gains such as Google search engines, cell phones, and game systems even though their quantity of goods &#038; services received has remained flat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Laura,</p>
<p>Thanks for the post. In America, the economic growth has been increasing the American wages. You will learn that economic growth is really measured by a statisistic called real GDP which is exactly the same thing as real income (they both add up to the same number).</p>
<p>I think what you are actually referring to is the fact that although America&#8217;s real income growth (&#8221;purchasing power&#8221;) has been strong this decade (2.5% average annual growth which is nominal income less inflation), the growth has been virtually non-existent for America&#8217;s middle class and poor. The real income gains have accrued almost exclusively to the educated &#8220;white collar&#8221; workers, the entrepreneurs, and the business owners (stock holders). Global competition has kept the middle and lower class wages down keeping a large part of the labor force at the same standard of living that they were at in 2000. The middle class is, however, enjoying many of the non-financial, quality gains such as Google search engines, cell phones, and game systems even though their quantity of goods &#038; services received has remained flat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura Perez</title>
		<link>http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/2008/09/10/welkers-daily-links-09092008/comment-page-1/#comment-5719</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura Perez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 15:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/2008/09/10/welkers-daily-links-09092008/#comment-5719</guid>
		<description>After learning about economic growth vs. economic development, I realized that this is a good example of the difference between these two characteristics. When looking at America's output one can see there has been economic growth, however this does not represent the true status of the American people. For example their wages are not increasing according to the increase in economic growth, so although the economy grows, it is not developing at the same rate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After learning about economic growth vs. economic development, I realized that this is a good example of the difference between these two characteristics. When looking at America&#8217;s output one can see there has been economic growth, however this does not represent the true status of the American people. For example their wages are not increasing according to the increase in economic growth, so although the economy grows, it is not developing at the same rate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura Perez</title>
		<link>http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/2008/09/10/welkers-daily-links-09092008/comment-page-1/#comment-5686</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura Perez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/2008/09/10/welkers-daily-links-09092008/#comment-5686</guid>
		<description>At first these statistics did not quite add up; the people do not feel like they are being compensated considering the output being produced. Not only that, but I read in another post that the American unemployment rate has actually increased to 6.1% from July 2008 where the rate stood at 5.7%. There are more people without jobs and yet the production continues to increase. I think that one of the factors which may partially explain these facts is the tide of immigrants that continue to arrive in America. It is a very controversial subject where two main sides are presented; are immigrants lowering the wages of Americans and are they taking away low-skill jobs from the natives? While many think this is the case, there is another side which argues that the economy growth is due largely to these immigrants and to banish these people from their country would be to bring their own downfall to their economy. Returning to the quote, the immigration in America could be what is distancing the track of productivity away from the American income.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At first these statistics did not quite add up; the people do not feel like they are being compensated considering the output being produced. Not only that, but I read in another post that the American unemployment rate has actually increased to 6.1% from July 2008 where the rate stood at 5.7%. There are more people without jobs and yet the production continues to increase. I think that one of the factors which may partially explain these facts is the tide of immigrants that continue to arrive in America. It is a very controversial subject where two main sides are presented; are immigrants lowering the wages of Americans and are they taking away low-skill jobs from the natives? While many think this is the case, there is another side which argues that the economy growth is due largely to these immigrants and to banish these people from their country would be to bring their own downfall to their economy. Returning to the quote, the immigration in America could be what is distancing the track of productivity away from the American income.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
