Sep 10 2008

Welker’s daily links 09/09/2008


About the author: Jason Welker is a teacher at Zurich International School in Switzerland, where he teaches Advanced Placement and International Baccalaureate Economics. Jason was an international school student in Malaysia before studying economics at Seattle University then earning his Masters in Education. He calls Seattle and Northern Idaho home. In addition to maintaining an economics wiki and this blog for economics student and educators, Jason also gives presentations on using Web 2.0 tools in education at workshops and conferences around the world. His economics wiki won the 2007 "Best Educational Wiki" award from the "EduBlog Awards".


Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • BarraPunto
  • blinkbits
  • BlinkList
  • blogmarks
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Haohao
  • Gwar
  • co.mments
  • blogtercimlap
  • Blue Dot
  • Book.mark.hu
  • LinkArena

3 Responses to “Welker’s daily links 09/09/2008”

  1. Laura Perezon 11 Sep 2008 at 3:58 am

    At first these statistics did not quite add up; the people do not feel like they are being compensated considering the output being produced. Not only that, but I read in another post that the American unemployment rate has actually increased to 6.1% from July 2008 where the rate stood at 5.7%. There are more people without jobs and yet the production continues to increase. I think that one of the factors which may partially explain these facts is the tide of immigrants that continue to arrive in America. It is a very controversial subject where two main sides are presented; are immigrants lowering the wages of Americans and are they taking away low-skill jobs from the natives? While many think this is the case, there is another side which argues that the economy growth is due largely to these immigrants and to banish these people from their country would be to bring their own downfall to their economy. Returning to the quote, the immigration in America could be what is distancing the track of productivity away from the American income.

  2. Laura Perezon 13 Sep 2008 at 11:25 pm

    After learning about economic growth vs. economic development, I realized that this is a good example of the difference between these two characteristics. When looking at America’s output one can see there has been economic growth, however this does not represent the true status of the American people. For example their wages are not increasing according to the increase in economic growth, so although the economy grows, it is not developing at the same rate.

  3. Steve Latteron 14 Sep 2008 at 4:24 am

    Hi Laura,

    Thanks for the post. In America, the economic growth has been increasing the American wages. You will learn that economic growth is really measured by a statisistic called real GDP which is exactly the same thing as real income (they both add up to the same number).

    I think what you are actually referring to is the fact that although America’s real income growth (”purchasing power”) has been strong this decade (2.5% average annual growth which is nominal income less inflation), the growth has been virtually non-existent for America’s middle class and poor. The real income gains have accrued almost exclusively to the educated “white collar” workers, the entrepreneurs, and the business owners (stock holders). Global competition has kept the middle and lower class wages down keeping a large part of the labor force at the same standard of living that they were at in 2000. The middle class is, however, enjoying many of the non-financial, quality gains such as Google search engines, cell phones, and game systems even though their quantity of goods & services received has remained flat.

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply