Sep 04 2008
Big government, small government? What, exactly, do the Republicans stand for?
Palin’s Intellectual Bipolar Disorder - Mises Economics Blog
Jeffrey Tucker at the Mises Economics Blog wonders what’s up with the conflicting statements coming from Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin:
One the one hand, she assails Obama as favoring big government, more taxes, more control from Washington, and everyone goes nuts denouncing government. Then only a few sentences later, she is blasting Obama for not favoring war enough, for wanting to give people too many rights, for not wanting military victory over the entire planet. People cheer that too.Do these people not realize that the same government that controls from Washington is also the institution that she is proposing have a world empire? Do these people not realize that global military occupation costs money that comes out of the pockets of American citizens? Do they not realize that a government that cares nothing about the rights of foreigners is not going to have much respect for the rights of its citizens either?
Sarah Palin - VP acceptance speech - Sep 3, 2008 pt1
Palin makes it sound so simple: Obama wants to take money out of Americans’ pockets and make us all poorer. Here’s his plan from Obama’s own website:

Technorati
Flickr
del.icio.us
Ice Rocket
Wikipedia























![Freakonomics [Revised and Expanded]: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything Freakonomics [Revised and Expanded]: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything](http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51Z1scnqz1L._SL160_.jpg)
![The World Is Flat [Updated and Expanded]: A Brief History of the Twenty-first Century by Thomas L. Friedman The World Is Flat [Updated and Expanded]: A Brief History of the Twenty-first Century](http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/410FGAGYGPL._SL160_.jpg)






Here’s an interesting related article about military Keynesianism:
“The imperial project is expensive. The flow of the nation’s wealth—from taxpayers and (increasingly) foreign lenders through the government to military contractors and (decreasingly) back to the taxpayers—has created a form of “military Keynesianism,” in which the domestic economy requires sustained military ambition in order to avoid recession or collapse.”
http://www.harpers.org/archive/2007/01/0081346
Interesting how Palin focused on the criticizm of Obama and very little on what she is going to do for the economy. The funniest thing is how she claims that Obama wants to take the money out of the pockets of the American people but doesnt’ say anything about her 27 million dollar earmark for the city of which she was mayor of with a population of 6,700.
I totally agree with Horia Stanescu. Why would she focus on just one person instead of focusing on the economy of the United States.
Isn’t it when Obama would take money out of the pockets of the American people, they would just have to pay more taxes which would be really unfair. Average Amercians are not that rich so how would they afford it?