<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Big government, small government? What, exactly, do the Republicans stand for?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/2008/09/04/big-government-small-government-what-exactly-do-the-republicans-stand-for/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/2008/09/04/big-government-small-government-what-exactly-do-the-republicans-stand-for/</link>
	<description>for students and teachers of AP and IB Economics</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 01:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fabienne Bergamin</title>
		<link>http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/2008/09/04/big-government-small-government-what-exactly-do-the-republicans-stand-for/comment-page-1/#comment-5678</link>
		<dc:creator>Fabienne Bergamin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 07:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/2008/09/04/big-government-small-government-what-exactly-do-the-republicans-stand-for/#comment-5678</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with Horia Stanescu. Why would she focus on just one person instead of focusing on the economy of the United States. 
Isn't it when Obama would take money out of the pockets of the American people, they would just have to pay more taxes which would be really unfair. Average Amercians are not that rich so how would they afford it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with Horia Stanescu. Why would she focus on just one person instead of focusing on the economy of the United States.<br />
Isn&#8217;t it when Obama would take money out of the pockets of the American people, they would just have to pay more taxes which would be really unfair. Average Amercians are not that rich so how would they afford it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Horia Stanescu</title>
		<link>http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/2008/09/04/big-government-small-government-what-exactly-do-the-republicans-stand-for/comment-page-1/#comment-5639</link>
		<dc:creator>Horia Stanescu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 14:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/2008/09/04/big-government-small-government-what-exactly-do-the-republicans-stand-for/#comment-5639</guid>
		<description>Interesting how Palin focused on the criticizm of Obama and very little on what she is going to do for the economy. The funniest thing is how she claims that Obama wants to take the money out of the pockets of the American people but doesnt' say anything about her 27 million dollar earmark for the city of which she was mayor of with a population of 6,700.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting how Palin focused on the criticizm of Obama and very little on what she is going to do for the economy. The funniest thing is how she claims that Obama wants to take the money out of the pockets of the American people but doesnt&#8217; say anything about her 27 million dollar earmark for the city of which she was mayor of with a population of 6,700.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Farren</title>
		<link>http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/2008/09/04/big-government-small-government-what-exactly-do-the-republicans-stand-for/comment-page-1/#comment-5612</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Farren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 17:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/2008/09/04/big-government-small-government-what-exactly-do-the-republicans-stand-for/#comment-5612</guid>
		<description>Here's an interesting related article about military Keynesianism: 

"The imperial project is expensive. The flow of the nation's wealth—from taxpayers and (increasingly) foreign lenders through the government to military contractors and (decreasingly) back to the taxpayers—has created a form of “military Keynesianism,” in which the domestic economy requires sustained military ambition in order to avoid recession or collapse."

http://www.harpers.org/archive/2007/01/0081346</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s an interesting related article about military Keynesianism: </p>
<p>&#8220;The imperial project is expensive. The flow of the nation&#8217;s wealth—from taxpayers and (increasingly) foreign lenders through the government to military contractors and (decreasingly) back to the taxpayers—has created a form of “military Keynesianism,” in which the domestic economy requires sustained military ambition in order to avoid recession or collapse.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.harpers.org/archive/2007/01/0081346" rel="nofollow">http://www.harpers.org/archive/2007/01/0081346</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
