<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Welker&#8217;s daily links 08/27/2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/2008/08/28/welkers-daily-links-08272008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/2008/08/28/welkers-daily-links-08272008/</link>
	<description>for students and teachers of AP and IB Economics</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 11:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Martin Ruefenacht</title>
		<link>http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/2008/08/28/welkers-daily-links-08272008/comment-page-1/#comment-5819</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Ruefenacht</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 08:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/2008/08/28/welkers-daily-links-08272008/#comment-5819</guid>
		<description>I disagree I do not feel that economics is a very difficult subject. I think that students choose different subjects, because of different reasons such as media influencing what is popular.

I think the reason for teachers missing to teach economics is partially, because of the lack of demand, but also a general shortage of as Jonny said because for public schools teaching might not be an attractive job opportunity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree I do not feel that economics is a very difficult subject. I think that students choose different subjects, because of different reasons such as media influencing what is popular.</p>
<p>I think the reason for teachers missing to teach economics is partially, because of the lack of demand, but also a general shortage of as Jonny said because for public schools teaching might not be an attractive job opportunity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Burkitt</title>
		<link>http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/2008/08/28/welkers-daily-links-08272008/comment-page-1/#comment-5789</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Burkitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 16:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/2008/08/28/welkers-daily-links-08272008/#comment-5789</guid>
		<description>There is a lack of teachers in the UK anyway, but you could say that people are to lazy to take it if they dont need to take it for the university they want to join.  They would rather take an easy A-level than a hard 1.   I think the schools need to put pressure on people to want to study the subject, boosting the demand and more teachers will start to appear</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a lack of teachers in the UK anyway, but you could say that people are to lazy to take it if they dont need to take it for the university they want to join.  They would rather take an easy A-level than a hard 1.   I think the schools need to put pressure on people to want to study the subject, boosting the demand and more teachers will start to appear</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Strong</title>
		<link>http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/2008/08/28/welkers-daily-links-08272008/comment-page-1/#comment-5782</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Strong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 11:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/2008/08/28/welkers-daily-links-08272008/#comment-5782</guid>
		<description>It's a shame that economics at A level is on the decline.  However there are reasons, one of which I found out looking on UCAS for University courses.  Those students who may want to study Economics at University do not necessarily need it to take the course and so many think that they can take other courses, to perhaps keep courses options open incase of a change of mind.  In this way Economics would naturally curve down in the amount of people studying it because there is no need to take it and taking other courses would seem beneficial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a shame that economics at A level is on the decline.  However there are reasons, one of which I found out looking on UCAS for University courses.  Those students who may want to study Economics at University do not necessarily need it to take the course and so many think that they can take other courses, to perhaps keep courses options open incase of a change of mind.  In this way Economics would naturally curve down in the amount of people studying it because there is no need to take it and taking other courses would seem beneficial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/2008/08/28/welkers-daily-links-08272008/comment-page-1/#comment-5553</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 13:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://welkerswikinomics.com/blog/2008/08/28/welkers-daily-links-08272008/#comment-5553</guid>
		<description>I don't know how much you already know about the A-level, but it's currently the biggest government educational issue in Britain at the moment.

The problem is that year on year students are getting better and better scores on their subjects. Now there are two explanations which have been forwarded for this. One is that students are simply getting better, and the other is that the tests are getting easier.

Whatever the explanation may be, the fact is that this qualification is fast becoming discredited, so much so that they have introduced a new top score; the A*.

I can already think of a few economic implications for this development. A lowering of the educational standard would surely affect Britain's economic competitiveness on the world stage. One way this could happen, for example, is through a decline of students taking economics. Having fewer economics-savvy people would mean that there would be less advice available for businesses, and therefore they could potentially lose out in the world economy.

As the educational standard is lowered, Britain's economy, which is slowly undergoing a structural change from an industrial to a services based one, could suffer severely from a brain drain, as there are simply too few people educated at a competitive standard.

In short: no brain, no gain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know how much you already know about the A-level, but it&#8217;s currently the biggest government educational issue in Britain at the moment.</p>
<p>The problem is that year on year students are getting better and better scores on their subjects. Now there are two explanations which have been forwarded for this. One is that students are simply getting better, and the other is that the tests are getting easier.</p>
<p>Whatever the explanation may be, the fact is that this qualification is fast becoming discredited, so much so that they have introduced a new top score; the A*.</p>
<p>I can already think of a few economic implications for this development. A lowering of the educational standard would surely affect Britain&#8217;s economic competitiveness on the world stage. One way this could happen, for example, is through a decline of students taking economics. Having fewer economics-savvy people would mean that there would be less advice available for businesses, and therefore they could potentially lose out in the world economy.</p>
<p>As the educational standard is lowered, Britain&#8217;s economy, which is slowly undergoing a structural change from an industrial to a services based one, could suffer severely from a brain drain, as there are simply too few people educated at a competitive standard.</p>
<p>In short: no brain, no gain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
