Today in IB Economics, as part of our unit on Economic Development, our class had an interesting discussion about the barriers developing countries face in improving the lives of the average citizen.

One obstacle persistent in many poor countries is the average citizen’s lack of access to a dependable banking system. Entrepreneurs interested in getting financing for a business endeavor may find themselves unable to access credit, as domestic banks may be unwilling to loan small amounts of money to individuals without a credit history or even any formal education or training. Meanwhile, international banks operating in developing countries are often there only to serve international investors and corporations that want to open up shop in the country. These banks may not even allow a common citizen of the developing country through its doors, much less consider giving them a loan.

Marco, a student in my class, mentioned an organization he’d heard of that allowed citizens from the developed world to log in and make loans directly to entrepreneurs in the developing world. The very concept of this variety of micro-lending seemed so straightforward and ingenious that I had to fine out more. Luckily, Marco found the website and this video about the organization, which goes by the name Kiva.org. From their website:

Kiva lets you connect with and loan money to unique small businesses in the developing world. By choosing a business on Kiva.org, you can “sponsor a business” and help the world’s working poor make great strides towards economic independence. Throughout the course of the loan (usually 6-12 months), you can receive email journal updates from the business you’ve sponsored. As loans are repaid, you get your loan money back.

Discussion Questions:

1. Why is investment necessary for economic development to occur?
2. What institutional factors exist that prevent improvements in human capital in some developing countries?
3. I micro-lending in general and Kiva.org in particular a realistic solution to the problem of poverty in developing countries?

FT.com / World – Panic sparks plunge in global markets

While Americans enjoyed a national holiday in honor of Martin Luther King yesterday, its stock markets remained closed. Elsewhere, however, stock markets from Asia to India to Europe to the UK experienced the worst one-day fall since 9/11. London’s FTSE fell more on Monday than it had since 1983. In Germany the market fell 7.2%. Here in Asia the picture was equally as dismal:

In Asia, Indian shares on Monday ended 7.4 per cent lower, and trading was halted in Mumbai after the market fell 9.8 per cent in the opening minutes; Hong Kong closed down 5.5 per cent; and Japan’s Nikkei average slid nearly 4 per cent, falling a further 4.4 per cent by midday on Tuesday while South Korea’s Kospi index lost a further 3.9 per cent. In the morning session on Tuesday, Hong Kong skidded another 8 per cent while Shanghai was down over 4 per cent. Indonesian shares sank 8 per cent in morning action.

In one day, literally trillions of dollars was lost in the value of the world’s stock markets; many are already referring to yesterday as Black Monday.

Continue Reading »

Check this out guys! Tonight I got a message on our Wiki from Antonio, an Econ professor from Africa. Here’s what he had to say:

Hi Jason,
I am Lecturer at the Economics Faculty in Maputo, Mozambique. I have recently come across your wiki and am really enjoying and learning a lot with it. I am creating my own wiki for my class, and your wiki provides a lot of insight. If you do not know Portuguese my wiki will not be of any use for you. In any case, I am the one who needs to learn with you. Thanks for the insights!
Best regards
Antonio

There’s globalization and education in the era of Web 2.0 at its best! International, teenage, Econ students living and going to school in Shanghai are helping African university professors and students learn economics. If you’re not convinced that the wiki’s effective, have a look at this. Here’s a map showing the last 100 visitors at Welker’s Wikinomics Wiki:

That’s right, guys, your wiki work is being seen, read, studied, and learned from all over the world! How amazing! Congratulations on all the great contributions you guys have made to the world on online economics education! You truly are teaching the world economics! 

Grinding poverty defies China’s boom – International Herald Tribune

Here at SAS my year two IB Econ students have started off the new year with a new unit: Economic Development. So far in the semester we’ve learned about what makes economic development different than economic growth. While gross domestic product may offer an indication of a country’s level of economic activity and output, it says little about the reality of life for the common person of developing countries.

To offer a more rounded figure for determining the level of economic development, the United Nations Development Program has created an alternative to GDP, the Human Development Index. The HDI accounts for the GDP per capita, the average level of primary and secondary education attained, literacy rates, and the life expectancy of citizens, to offer a glimpse into the reality of not just material wealth, but health and education in developing countries.

Continue Reading »

My Way News – Transit Panel Urges Gas Tax Increase

Looks like an increase in the gas tax might be on the horizon… but is it enough? Look at what the proponents of this tax want to do with the revenue:

Under the recommendation, the current tax of 18.4 cents per gallon for unleaded gasoline would be increased annually for five years – by anywhere from 5 cents to 8 cents each year – and then indexed to inflation afterward to help fix the infrastructure, expand public transit and highways as well as broaden railway and rural access, according to persons with direct knowledge of the report…

Okay, so driving places lots of strain on our physical infrastructure (i.e. roads, bridges, highways, etc.), surely we can consider that an externality that could be mitigated through a corrective tax. But does 40 cents over five years sound like enough to correct the negative externalities not identified here? What costs does America’s bad driving habit place on society beyond infrastructure degradation?

Thanks to Professor Haab for the link

Powered by ScribeFire.

The Nano comes with its own moral dilemma. – By Anne Applebaum – Slate Magazine

Tata Motors of India recently launched the world’s cheapest automobile, the Nano.

“…meet the Nano, possibly the most significant new car of the decade. Small, cute, and snub-nosed, it fits four people and a duffel bag, has a single windshield wiper, travels at 60 mph, and it’s all yours for the princely sum of $2,500…”

Tata plans to build and sell 250,000 Nanos this year in India, spreading production to Africa, South America, and Southeast Asia. Clearly the company is targeting not the traditional auto markets of Europe and North America, rather the regions traditionally thought of as poor and thus not associated with auto sales.

What is the meaning of this “car for the masses”? At first glance, it looks like the perfect solution for bringing millions of the world’s poor (if not super-poor) closer to the dream of achieving a quality of life previously only accessible by the world’s middle class and rich. Great,  so what could possible be bad about fulfilling the dreams of so many of the world’s poor? The answer? Externalities…

“Though the small Nano uses less gasoline than many larger cars, the enormous potential numbers could mean an equally enormous environmental impact. Since it will be a long time before Nano drivers will be able to afford the $20,000-plus hybrids now on the market, let alone a Honda FCX Clarity, the prototype experimental hydrogen car thought to be worth as much as $10 million apiece, that means an exponential rise in carbon emissions as well as other kinds of pollutants. The United Nations’ top climate scientist, Indian economist Rajendra Pachauri—chair of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which shared the Nobel Peace Prize with Al Gore—has said he is already “having nightmares” about precisely this scenario.”

Herein lies the moral dilemma of the Nano: where does society’s desire to improve the lot of the world’s poor come into conflict with society’s desire to to improve the environment and minimize the impact global warming?

What do you think? Do the social benefits of a $2,500 car exceed the social costs it will likely impose? Does the Nano’s $2,500 price incorporate the full costs that its existence places on society and the environment? Should we jump for joy at the thought of millions upon millions of the world’s poor finally having access to the convenience of automobile transport? Or should we pause with uncertainty to contemplate the effect on the environment and the social costs that millions of cheap cars will impose on the world?

Powered by ScribeFire.

Matt Rothschild of Progressive Magazine concludes that global warming is one “giant market failure”, and argues that US president George W. Bush is making it too hard for regulators in the country that is the world’s largest emitter of greenhouse gases to impose limits on pollution.

Among the externalities caused by the emission of greenhouse gases that Rothschild points out:

• Rising sea levels
• Arctic free of ice
• Draughts  in Africa

"Global warming is a giant market failure" [ 1:28 ] Play Now | Play in Popup | Download (14)

Discussion questions:

1. Is Rothchild’s understanding of global warming as a market failure correct in an economic sense?
2. Is imposing new “limits on pollution” the best way achieve a long-term reduction in the emission of greenhouse gases?
3. What alternatives to direct government controls over firms’ emissions does the Bush administration have that may make use of “markets” to correct this “giant market failure”?

Michael Munger, Bosses Don’t Wear Bunny Slippers, If Markets Are So Great, Why Are There Firms: Library of Economics and Liberty

The other day when we introduced our unit on market failure, we began by revisiting the concept of free markets as mechanisms for allocating scarce resources efficiently. As I was reading blogs tonight, I stumbled upon this blog post by Michael Munger, professor of political economy at Duke University, where he shares an anecdote he uses when introducing the allocating power of markets through the price mechanism:

When I teach political economy, I start with the neoclassical theory of consumption, and then cover production. And I show students how miraculous is it that the actions of millions of people who have never met can be directed by prices. Resources move toward their highest valued use, and consumption goods are delivered to the consumers who want them.

For example, the United States promoted ethanol as an auto fuel. This sharply increased the price of corn worldwide. As Brazilian reporter Kieran Gartlan put it: “Higher prices are leading Brazilian farmers to plant more second crop corn this year, and the country’s modest corn exports are expected to expand [from 42 million tonnes to 48 million tonnes, an increase of 230 million bushels.]” (DTN, March 2, 2007, emphasis mine).

No one directed the Brazilian farmers to shift to corn production. The article puts it perfectly: “Higher prices are leading farmers….” The leadership comes from the prices themselves! The farmers may have had no idea why the price of corn had increased, to $4.00 per bushel. (After all, Brazil uses sugar, not corn, to produce its ethanol.) But Brazilian corn production increased within a year, by nearly 15%. No one made the farmers switch; they made choices. Other corn producers, in Argentina, Mexico, and several African countries, followed suit. No one talked about it, no one gave any orders; prices led them.

The reason I post this excerpt from professor Munger’s blog now is that it serves as a great response to a student who on the first day of our market failure class posited that perhaps the government could do a better job of deciding what goods and services and how much of them should be produced in an economy.

Yes, markets fail, and for many reasons: a concentration of power among a few large firms, an underallocation of resources towards goods that have spillover benefits, the over-provision of goods that have spillover costs, the failure of the market to provide public goods: these are examples of how market fail.

But when markets work, they really work! The efficiency of resource allocation that results from free, competitive, markets is unrivaled by any central planning agency. Munger’s example above is a simple illustration of this allocative power of markets and prices.

Powered by ScribeFire.

Greg Mankiw’s Blog: The Pigou Club Manifesto

Here’s a good question to bring up around the dinner table with mom and dad tonight: “When is more taxes good?” Most individuals in society despise taxes; what is it the cynics say? “The only things guaranteed in life are death and taxes.” Clearly, the thought of giving money to the government is as miserable for some as the thought of dying!

But when might more taxes be good taxes? The answer, as you may have guessed, has to do with the concept of negative externalities and the idea that a tax may be used to correct a market failure of too many resources being allocated towards a particular product. One such product towards which too many resources have been allocated in the last several decades is gasoline; that’s right petroleum gas, the life blood of our beloved automobiles, the symbols of our very freedom and prosperity we cherish so much. How do we know too many resources have gone towards the production of gasoline? Simple, there’s too much of it and it’s too cheap. Evidence? Just look around:

• Congested roads
• Urban smog
• Auto accident fatalities
• Shortage of parking spaces in most cities
• Noise pollution
• Sprawling road systems that ugly the landscape
• Global warming

All of the above ills in some way are the result of cheap gasoline. The market failure here is simple: too much gas has been produced and it sells for too cheaply, hence, lots of people drive lots of huge, gas-guzzling SUVs, trucks, vans, sports cars, luxury sedans, Hummers, and not enough small, economical, fuel-efficient automobiles that would put way less a strain on our urban and natural environments.

So what do we do now to fix this problem? Should be dismantle all the oil refineries, shut down the gas stations, and blow up the pipelines that facilitate the production of gasoline? Well, that would be one option, although it’s not ideal. Another might be to require that all auto makers achieve a certain level of fuel-efficiency among their automobiles. That’s what the US government has done by adopting the “Corporate Average Fuel Economy” (CAFE) standards. This sort of direct control creates market distortions of its own, however. One economist has said, “the CAFE standard was a failure and said it was like trying to fight obesity by requiring tailors to make only small-sized clothes”

Continue Reading »

Shanghai American School Economists – A podcast and blog produced by AP Econonomics students at Shanghai American School

Sometimes I read something written by students and I can hardly believe what I see. Students who utter barely a word in class somehow manage to write like journalists when they know their words will be read by more than just their teacher. Sometimes students are afraid to write for an audience, but sometimes the very thought of doing so motivates them to create something special, challenge themselves, push the limits of their knowledge and skills.

Back in September of 2007, about six months into my own career as a blogging economics teacher, I created a website where my students could freely post their own economics pieces. I explained to students that the site was for their own use; anyone could register as an author, write whatever they wanted, and post it to the blog whenever they pleased. I promised I would only step in and edit were something inappropriate or grossly inaccurate to appear. So far, I’ve not had to edit a single student article. And the amazing thing is, the articles that appear on this blog are getting better and better as the year goes on!

As and econ blogger myself, I am starting to realize that what I do every night, when I write articles for my students’ benefit, is not that impressive, because the articles THEY are writing are just as good if not better than the ones I write on my blog! For example, kids are now beginning to read the news as if the ARE economists, and when they identify an economic principle in something they read, they are challenging themselves to blog it on their AP Economics blog. Again, these kids are not required to write articles for this blog, but for some reason, they just DO! I love it!

If you haven’t yet, check out the SAS Economists AP Economics student blog. Not only are there some entertaining and educational articles about economics posted, but over 25 student-created podcasts too (both audio and video) exploring the economic concepts we’ve studied so far in microeconomics.

A website that started out as a fun little experiment in student blogging has turned into a forum for students whose voices may be heard by few during class, but through the world of Web 2.0 can be heard by thousands over the web!

Powered by ScribeFire.