Oct 28 2007

Ah ha - so that explains the long lines at the petrol stations around Shanghai this weekend!

China rations diesel as record oil hits supplies | Markets | ReutersQueues at China's pumps

As I headed into the city for dinner with friends on Saturday night, I witnessed an unusual site: as our taxi passed a petrol station, I saw about 25 or 30 blue trucks (the ubiquitous medium of transporting good from Shanghai’s factories to her ports) spilling out of the parking lot into the road, apparently queued, waiting for a spot at the pump. I’d never seen such a line at any of the petrol stations around Shanghai, and briefly wondered whether it was just a busy night or whether something else was amiss.

Well, reading the headlines in today’s news, I stumbled upon a clear economic answer to the petrol pump mystery. It appears that China has begun rationing diesel fuel at petrol stations in the East Coat provinces.

Truck drivers reported long queues at petrol stations along a national highway linking Fujian and Zhejiang provinces, with each truck getting 100 yuan ($13) worth of diesel, or around 20 litres, per visit at a state-run station and 40 litres at a private kiosk…

“What’s wrong with the oil market? Our drivers had to queue the whole night for only a small amount of fill, slowing the traffic by almost one day,” said Gao Meili, who manages a logistics company.


China is a major importer of oil. With an economy growing around 12%, much of the country’s growth depends on the availability of crude oil at reasonable prices, which China’s oil refining firms turn into diesel, needed to get Chinese manufactured products from factory to port and from port to overseas consumers.

The problem with the oil market in China, however, is that as “Chinese refiners cannot pass the souring crude costs on to consumers.” Oil is an input needed to make a finished product, diesel. As the price of oil goes up (it reached a record of $92 per barrel this week), the average variable costs (AVC), the average total cost (ATC), and the marginal cost (MC) of oil refiners shift upwards. In the petrol market, this leads to a leftward shift of the supply curve since, as we learned, the market supply curve represents the horizontal sums of all the individual firms’ MC curves above their AVCs. As AVC, ATC and MC shift up, this causes a leftward shift (a decrease) in the industry supply. Remember, higher resource costs are a determinant of supply. In this instance, oil is the resource needed to manufacture petrol.

In a free market, a decrease in supply leads to an increase in price. Herein lies the problem with the Chinese oil market that the manager above inquires about: the Chinese petroleum market is not a free market. The government plays an active role in controlling prices paid by consumers for the finished product refiners are producing, petrol fuel:

Beijing fears stoking already high inflation and rigidly caps pump fuel rates to shield users from a 50 percent rally in global oil so far this year.

As firms’ cost curves are shifting up, the government is more concerned about “shielding” consumers from the skyrocketing world oil prices by assuring them a constant, low rate at the pump. Essentially this is another example of a price ceiling, which as we have learned is meant to help consumers at the expense of produces, but usually ends up harming both producers and consumers, as shortages result in excess demand. This explains the queue of 30 blue trucks spilling onto Huaxiang road last night.

So why, exactly, does the government’s enforcement of a lower than equilibrium price result in such severe shortages that truck drivers are only allowed to pump 20 litres of petrol per visit and made to wait hours each time they need to refill? Here’s the short answer to this question:Economic losses

As we learned, as costs rise (AVC, ATC and MC shifting up) in a competitive market and price (MR=AR=P) remains the same, economic profits are eliminated and losses incurred (click graph to the right). If costs remain high (as they have in the case of China’s refiners due to the ever rising price of oil, its main input), firms will begin to exit the industry and shift their resources towards a more profitable market. In the case of Chinese oil refiners, they have begun to shut down certain plants as losses are incurred:

China’s army of small local oil refiners — a growing swing supplier making up more than 10 percent of the market — have cut output more sharply, exacerbating the tightness, officials said.

Exit eliminates losses
In a free market, this reduction in supply is just what is needed to restore the market to equilibrium. As firms exit, market supply shifts left, raising the market price, eliminating losses, and perhaps even restoring profits for oil refiners. (click on graph to the right)

The problem with the Chinese market, however, is that this long-run adjustment is kept from happening by a government that refuses to allow the market price to adjust upwards, meaning the Chinese petrol market is stuck in disequilibrium. Price controls mean quantity demanded will exceed quantity supplied: thus, the lines of blue trucks waiting their turn to pump 20 litres of diesel into their tanks.

Clearly the intent is to help petrol consumer by keeping fuel affordable; this fails as is evident by consumer frustration in the petrol market. Not only does government interference harm Chinese consumers and Chinese producers, but ironically it actually may benefit foreign petroleum producers, who have enjoyed greater demand for their output by petrol-thirsty Chinese consumers:

These supply cuts have forced China to boost its imports from international markets, traders said.

Following a rare surge in gasoline imports in September, top refiner Sinopec also extended strong diesel imports into November, buying at least 60,000 tonnes and looking for more to replenish dwindling stocks.

“The market is chaotic now. We are worried that supplies in the coming months could be even tighter,” said the Guangzhou official.

If you were president Hu’s economic adviser, what would you suggest as a solution to the woes in China’s petrol market?

Powered by ScribeFire.


About the author: Jason Welker is a teacher at Zurich International School in Switzerland, where he teaches Advanced Placement and International Baccalaureate Economics. Jason was an international school student in Malaysia before studying economics at Seattle University then earning his Masters in Education. He calls Seattle and Northern Idaho home. In addition to maintaining an economics wiki and this blog for economics student and educators, Jason also gives presentations on using Web 2.0 tools in education at workshops and conferences around the world. His economics wiki won the 2007 "Best Educational Wiki" award from the "EduBlog Awards".


Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • BarraPunto
  • blinkbits
  • BlinkList
  • blogmarks
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Haohao
  • Gwar
  • co.mments
  • blogtercimlap
  • Blue Dot
  • Book.mark.hu
  • LinkArena

11 Responses to “Ah ha - so that explains the long lines at the petrol stations around Shanghai this weekend!”

  1. kevinyehon 29 Oct 2007 at 3:09 am

    This article actually also shows how ineffective command economies are when it comes to resource and price allocation. Although the government can set the price as low as they want, it doesn’t cause a change in the supply curve, and so suddenly there is a shortage of supply, leading to these long lines and diesel rationing.

  2. Jessica Ngon 29 Oct 2007 at 10:09 am

    In a government regulated economy like that of China’s, the economy fails to adjust itself like a competitive economy will. In a competitive market, in the long-run, the economy will return to equilibrium. But since in this case, the market is not a “price-taker” and instead acts as a “price-setter”, this situation leads to disequilibrium of the oil market, leading to crisis such as this, in which the quantity demanded exceeds the quantity supplied.

  3. Hansen Guon 29 Oct 2007 at 5:40 pm

    I think the government should relinquish their hold on the oil market a little. As Gao stated, some people are ready to pay a little more if they can get the oil. The Chinese government, in hopes to shield consumers, has reduced supply. This is only a quick fix for consumer happiness. In the long run, supply will not reach equilibrium again because the price ceiling is in order and new firms cannot enter the market.

  4. Jonathan Lauon 29 Oct 2007 at 9:07 pm

    I agree with Hansen. If the Chinese government wants to solve this issue with the petroleum market, it must loose its hold on the price of oil. Although the price ceiling is imployed in order to make gas more affordable, quantity demanded is currently exceeding quantity supplied and as a result, large lines of trucks are queued up at gas stations. To solve this problem, the government must gradually remove the price ceiling so that the market price for fuel climbs back toward equilibrium price.

  5. Bryan Bockon 29 Oct 2007 at 10:19 pm

    It is very ironic how the Chinese government tries to help improve the conditions of the consumers but they are actually creating more problems in the future. Although there are certain advantage of having a command economy, but for situation like this, it is where the command economy meet its limitation. Like how Hansen and Jonathan said, the Chinese government should think about an alternative in order to solve this issue. Therefore, they should release at least a fair amount of control on the oil market.

  6. Angel Liuon 31 Oct 2007 at 7:23 pm

    I think the Chinese government is too protective of its consumers. The problem comes from China’s high inflation. If inflation rate can be controlled, the government will release grip on diesel rationing because right now, the Chinese government is afraid that if they let diesel adjust into equilibrium, it is too much inflation for the country to handle. As a few people mentioned above that a price floor can only temporarily ease the problem, the government would perform rationally if it has less economic problems to deal with.

  7. andreason 01 Nov 2007 at 11:11 pm

    This can be viewed as a price ceiling. The reduction in supply of oil only goes to show how the government/economy is clearly inefficient. The supply will not change even if prices are set lower which is what causes the long lines at petrol stations, the QD is beyond that of the supply. In the long run, in an attempt to try and help consumers of petrol, they will probably actually end up hurting their own economy.

  8. [...] Ah ha - so that explains the long lines at the petrol stations around Shanghai this weekend! [...]

  9. ed tangon 05 Nov 2007 at 11:14 am

    The chinese government is helping the consumers only to create problems in the future. The quantity demanded will exceed the quantity supplied which means the market price will never result at equilibrium price.

  10. MichaelChowon 15 Nov 2007 at 6:27 pm

    By limiting the amount of diesel fuel each truck gets to 20 liters, shows the power of the command economy in China. The government in China has tried to set a price ceiling on the amount of fuel able to be purchased at each time. I agree with how although prices can be as low as the government wishes as Kevin Yeh mentioned there is nothing done to the supply curve but in trying to keep up with the prices there will be a shortage in supply

  11. Mondon 18 Nov 2007 at 5:00 pm

    The government should remove the price ceiling, although it might sound impressive to the uneducated masses of China that the government is regulating and controlling oil prices, it creates inefficiency (dead weight loss). The quantity demanded exceeds the quantity supplied, which is problematic in the long-run and will potential cause more and more problems

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply